Which rule states that if a part of a writing is introduced, the other part may be admissible to avoid misinterpretation?

Which rule states that if a part of a writing is introduced, the other part may be admissible to avoid misinterpretation?

• A. Rule 106
• B. Rule 701
• C. Rule 902
• D. Rule 606

Answer: (A)

This question tests the completeness approach to evidence. The idea is that when a party introduces part of a writing or recorded statement, the other party may introduce remaining portions of that same writing to prevent misinterpretation or unfairness. The rule allows the rest of the writing to be admitted if it clarifies the meaning, puts the excerpt in proper context, or shows how the parts fit together. This keeps the jury from being misled by a fragment and ensures the full sense of the document is understood. Other rules cover different topics, such as lay opinion testimony, self-authentication of documents, or impeachment of a juror’s verdict, which are unrelated to ensuring completeness of written passages.

This question tests the completeness approach to evidence. The idea is that when a party introduces part of a writing or recorded statement, the other party may introduce remaining portions of that same writing to prevent misinterpretation or unfairness. The rule allows the rest of the writing to be admitted if it clarifies the meaning, puts the excerpt in proper context, or shows how the parts fit together. This keeps the jury from being misled by a fragment and ensures the full sense of the document is understood.

Other rules cover different topics, such as lay opinion testimony, self-authentication of documents, or impeachment of a juror’s verdict, which are unrelated to ensuring completeness of written passages.